Process Guidance
Cochrane Collaboration
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tools and resources will guide your systematic review whether or not it is a Cochrane Review.
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews
- Cochrane Handbook for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews: in development
Institute of Medicine, National Academies
JBI
The Manual for Evidence Synthesis provides guidance for all types of systematic and other expert reviews.
Reporting
Various Guidelines
- Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)
- Reporting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses in Environmental Research (ROSES)
- Structured Approach to the Reporting in Healthcare Education of Evidence Synthesis (STORIES)
The PRISMA Statement
PRISMA stands for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. PRISMA has several extensions, including extensions for protocols, individual patient data, network meta-analyses, and more.
- PRISMA Statement
- PRISMA Explanation and Elaboration
- PRISMA Protocol Extension
- PRISMA Checklist
- PRISMA Flow Diagram
- PRISMA Search Extension
- Other PRISMA Extensions
Other Relevant Publications
- Whiting, P., Savović, J., Higgins, J. P., Caldwell, D. M., Reeves, B. C., Shea, B., Davies, P., Kleijnen, J., Churchill, R., & ROBIS group (2016). ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
- University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. “Registering a Review on PROSPERO.” https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#guidancenotes